Legal Opinion
Martin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 24, 2002No. 5D01-1543PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
816 So.2d 1213 (2002)
Timothy MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D01-1543.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 24, 2002.
Timothy Martin, Bushnell, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert E. Bodnar, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PLEUS, J.
The appellant, Timothy Martin ("Martin"), challenges the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion[1] on the ground that he failed to receive credit for previous gain time as promised by the trial court. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court resentenced Martin to "nine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Davis v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Foldi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Flowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dellofano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- McAllister v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004