Legal Opinion
Akerson v. Gupta
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided October 18, 1978No. 77-123C(3)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
458 F.Supp. 189 (1978)
Warren K. AKERSON et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Giri Raj GUPTA et al., Defendants.
No. 77-123C(3).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
October 18, 1978.
Charles G. Siebert, Schlafly, Griesedieck, Ferrell & Toft, St. Louis, Mo., for all plaintiffs.
Richard Wolff, Kappel, Neill, Staed & Wolff, Clayton, Mo., for defendants.
ORDER
NANGLE, District Judge.
Pursuant to the memorandum filed this date,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment be and is granted and that defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Havenfield Corporation v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Westamerica Securities, Inc. v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Ohio Co. v. RosemeierOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Cameron State Bank v. SloanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Barrett, Fitch, North & Co. v. HudsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Messersmith v. G.T. Murray & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Board of County Commissioners v. Laramie County School District No. OneWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Toupin v. LaverdiereSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Leasing Service Corp. v. Hobbs Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Bd. of Cty. Com'rs v. Laramie Sch. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.