Legal Opinion

Canel v. Topinka

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 2003No. 1-01-2069Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

793 N.E.2d 845 (2003)

342 Ill. App.3d 65

276 Ill.Dec. 86

James H. CANEL, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Judy Barr TOPINKA, Treasurer of the State of Illinois, and Mitchell Property Division, Office of the Treasurer of the State of Illinois, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 1-01-2069.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division.

June 30, 2003.

Arthur T. Susman, Charles R. Watkins, and John R. Wylie of Suman & Watkins; William J. Harte, William J. Harte Ltd., Chicago, for Appellant.

James E. Ryan & Brett E. Legener, of the Attorney…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hall; Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API