Legal Opinion

Chapin v. Allen

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 27, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from district court. Action by Horton A. Chapin against Louis M. Allen. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was brought upon a promissory note. On ,the trial the following facts appeared: Early in the spring of 1890 appellant entered into a contract with the respondent to place a steam-heating apparatus in his house at Westwood, N. J., the whole to cost $409.72. When the work was done, the respondent paid all but $50 in cash, and at the same time gave the promissory note in question, in the words and figures following: “$50.00. Westwood, June 20th, 1890. Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of Horton A. Chapin fifty dollars at Westwood for value received. Payable sooner,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Juilliard v. . ChaffeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Bookstaver v. . JayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Denniston v. BaconNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  4. Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. HartungNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hurst v. Trow's Printing & Bookbinding Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API