Legal Opinion

Schoenborn v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 26, 2007No. Civil Action No. 07-0544 (RMU)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting in Part and Denying in Part Pifer’s Motion to Intervene

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Kimberly Pifer seeks to intervene in pending wrongful death and survival actions *7brought by Pifer’s step-father, Gregory Schoenborn, following the death of Pifer’s mother, Martha Schoenborn. Because Pifer does not have a legally cognizable interest under the Survival Act, D.C.Code § 12-101, the court denies Pifer’s request to intervene in that action. But, because Pifer’s interest may be adverse to Gregory Schoenborn’s interest in seeking compensation under the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. James W. McCord Jr. v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Joseph Foster v. Albert Gueory, Ronald Dorsey, and Rudolph J. Thornton v. Local 2311 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Semler v. Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D. C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refinishing & Restoration, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Wagdy v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API