State v. Harrington

STROUD, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon his guilty plea to robbery with a dangerous weapon. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for extraordinary mitigation. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Because defendant pled guilty and his only argument on appeal is regarding his sentencing, we need not provide a thorough background of the underlying crime in this case. At defendant's sentencing hearing, he moved for extraordinary mitigation because he contends that the armed robbery was gang-related and that he put himself at "great personal…