Legal Opinion

In Re Baker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2001No. 49S00-0008-DI-459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

DISCIPLINARY ACTION.

Lawyer Robert M. Baker, III, violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by sending to an opposing party a letter concerning matters related to the respondent's representation of a client, where the respondent knew the opposing party was represented by counsel and where the opposing party's counsel did not consent to the contact.

This matter comes before us upon the respondent and the Disciplinary Commission's Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, wherein they agree that the respondent engaged in misconduct and that a public reprimand is an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of MahoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re UttermohlenIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Matter of Angela Sallee Field TrappIndiana Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API