Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Aquilino, Judge:
In this action, which has been designated a test case pursuant to CIT Rule 84, the plaintiff recites Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803), that it is “emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is” but also takes the position that that has already occurred in a matter like this.
I
The origin of this case can be found in subtitle B of Title I of Public Law No. 97-446, 96 Stat. 2329, 2346, known as the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1982 and which had as its purpose “enabl[ing] the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Costa Crociere, S.P.A. v. RoseDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Nobelpharma U.S.A. Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Starkey Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998