Legal Opinion
State v. Contini
Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas
Decided April 20, 1961No. 34685PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLamneck, J.
The defendant in this action is charged in an affidavit filed in the Mayor’s Court of the City of Dover, Ohio, with violating the zoning ordinances of the City of .Dover, Ohio, *212known as Ordinances Nos. 1671 and 2210, in that he is conducting a certain business on Lots 1468, 1469, 1470, 1531 and. 1532 in said city which are alleged to be located in a residential zone of said city. ^
The defendant entered a plea of not guilty in the Mayor’s Court and thereafter the defendant filed an application of prejudice against the Mayor. This court acted on said affidavit of prejudice and pursuant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jennings v. SuggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Latham v. . SpraginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State ex Castle National Inc. v. Wickliffe (Village)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- State, Ex Rel. v. Village of WickliffeOhio Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roberson v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Roberson v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970