Wade v. McCormack
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. The judgment in the court below was not authorized by the law under the evidence. Buhe v. Compton, 49 Mo. App. 304; Green v. Steinberg, 15 Id. 32; Pierce v. Rollins, 60 Id. 520; Ansele v. Groby, 62 Id. 421. This action was properly brought under section 6392 of the statutes.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
This is an action under section 6392 of the Bevised Statutes to recover rent and the possession of certain premises situated in the city of St. Louis, and the only question is whether the relation of land-*13land and tenant exists between the parties. The plaintiff recovered before the justice and in the circuit court, and he has brought the case by successive appeals to this court.
There is no dispute about the facts. On March 3, 1888, and April 6, 1889, the defendant executed two deeds of trust conveying the property in question to a trustee for the purpose of securing an indebtedness therein…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hrovat v. BinghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Equity Building & Loan Ass'n v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Parsons v. PalmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907