Legal Opinion

Shibley v. Schultz Bros. & Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1934No. 913Published

1Opinion of the Court

*455OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

It will be observed that all of the questions here involved arose under the old securities act of Ohio, since in large part repealed or amended.

Six specifications of error are urged by plaintiff, which may be grouped under two heads:

1. Error in directing a verdict and entering judgment for defendants.

2. Error in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Two questions are here presented:

1. Does the record disclose any evidence of misrepresentations of fact by defendant which could be the basis of a recovery by plaintiff?

2. Does violation of the securities act ipso…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Richards v. FoulkeOhio Supreme Court · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API