Legal Opinion

Paine v. Newton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1939No. 33867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-owen, J.

The appellant prosecutes within time and appeals from two decrees against her in the Chancery Court, and in favor of appellee, J. E. Newton.

The procedure in the lower court was practically the same as depicted in the case of Paine v. Mikell, Miss., 192 So. 15, decided by Division B on the 13th day of November, 1939.

It is asserted by appellee that the two cases are controlled by the same principles of law, but we are of opinion that the factual situation renders it necessary for us to state the case.

We consider the case here on the direct appeal from the default decree rendered on the bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmetto Fire Ins. Co. v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Paine v. MikellMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Thomas v. B. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. NewmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Britton v. Magnolia State Casket & Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API