Colby v. Colby
Supreme Court of Vermont
The nature of the action originally brought, does not appear in any of the papers furnished to the reporter. The case was referred, and the referees reported the following facts. The plaintiff became of age March 14, 1824, and soon thereafter agreed to go to work for his father, the defendant, and take his pay in land. No time was specified and no price was agreed upon.
Read the full summary
The nature of the action originally brought, does not appear in any of the papers furnished to the reporter. The case was referred, and the referees reported the following facts. The plaintiff became of age March 14, 1824, and soon thereafter agreed to go to work for his father, the defendant, and take his pay in land. No time was specified and no price was agreed upon. The plaintiff labored for the defendant till 1836, when, having intimated Ms desire for some security for Ms services, the defendant executed and lodged in the town clerk’s office in Berlin, a deed to the plaintiff of one…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Redeield, Ch. J.
The only question made in the present case is in regard to the estate which remained in the defendant after his deed to the plaintiff of the one hundred acres. We think it must be regarded as a life estate, which he could use at any time when he chose,- and that the right to use it was intended to continue through life, as a security for his maintenance. This is the only reasonable construction to be put upon the terms of the deed, when viewed in connection with the purpose of the conveyance, and the situation of the parties.
The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Varner v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Collins v. LavelleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
- Commons v. CommonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Eysaman v. EysamanNew York Supreme Court · 1881