H. L. Braham & Co. v. Surrell
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The H. L. Braham & Co., appellant, issued a writ of replevin against W. W. Surrell and J. Albert Kramer to recover possession of an Auburn sedan automobile, serial No. 24469A, motor No. 5-8097. The sheriff replevied the car from Kramer, in whose possession he found it, and delivered it to the plaintiff. Surrell was dead, and the writ, as to him, was returned “nihil habet.”
The plaintiff filed a declaration, which did not comply with the directions of the Replevin Act of April 19, 1901, P. L. 88, Section 4, providing that the declaration shall consist of a concise…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Hamilton v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Drumgoole v. LyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Bank of North America v. Penn Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ambler National Bank v. Maryland Credit Finance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Sunbury Fin. Co., Inc. v. Boyd M. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Sork v. LabelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- United States v. One Ford TruckDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- Southeast First Natl Bank v. Security Peoples Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.