Legal Opinion

Stephen Matthew Sutphin v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 18, 2012No. 1376112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUMPHREYS, Judge.

Stephen Matthew Sutphin (“Sutphin”) was convicted of perjury by giving conflicting testimony on separate occasions as to the same matter under Code § 18.2-435 following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the County of Amelia (“trial court”). On appeal, Sutphin contends that the trial court erred in finding the evidence sufficient to convict him of perjury, because the evidence of falsity was uncorroborated, ambiguous, and failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Despite the fact that the evidence is clearly insufficient for the offense charged, for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Redman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  3. Thomas v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  4. Keffer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince Adjei v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
  2. Alisha Renee Merritt v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  3. Calvin Eugene Clark, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API