Smith v. Bank of Delaware
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, Justice:
The question presented by this appeal from the Court of Chancery is whether the living beneficiary of a spendthrift trust may, after having received the benefits for many years, renounce a portion of the future income.
The appellee, as trustee of an inter vivos trust created by Joshua A. Ellegood, filed a bill seeking instructions on the debated question. The Court below held the renunciation invalid on the unqualified ground that, since a beneficiary cannot accept part and disclaim part of a unitary gift at its inception, she may not thereafter reject part of the gift. See…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Borsch EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
- Weymouth v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Polotsky v. Artisans Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bank of Delaware v. ClarkCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968