Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bank of Delaware

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 4, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, Justice:

The question presented by this appeal from the Court of Chancery is whether the living beneficiary of a spendthrift trust may, after having received the benefits for many years, renounce a portion of the future income.

The appellee, as trustee of an inter vivos trust created by Joshua A. Ellegood, filed a bill seeking instructions on the debated question. The Court below held the renunciation invalid on the unqualified ground that, since a beneficiary cannot accept part and disclaim part of a unitary gift at its inception, she may not thereafter reject part of the gift. See…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Borsch EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  4. Weymouth v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  5. Polotsky v. Artisans Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bank of Delaware v. ClarkCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API