Legal Opinion

Farrell v. City of Auburn

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 31, 2010No. Docket: And-09-221PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Michael A. Farrell appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Delahcmty, J.) pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80B affirming a decision by the City of Auburn Board of Appeals (Board) that upheld a “Notice of Violation/Order to Correct” issued by the City’s Code Enforcement Officer. Because we conclude that the Board’s decision in this matter was advisory in nature and not subject to judicial review, we vacate the judgment of the Superior Court and remand with instructions to dismiss Farrell’s Rule 80B claim and to proceed with the other independent claims…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herrle v. Town of WaterboroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Pepperman v. Town of RangeleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Thomas v. BFC Marine/Bath Fuel Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Sanborn v. Town of SebagoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Jones v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William Clark v. Hancock County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of ArundelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. Donald R. Paradis v. Town of PeruSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. Daniel Raposa Jr. v. Town of YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  5. Raposa v. Town of YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API