Hendrickson Machine Co. v. Schumacher Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHouck, J.
Coming now to a brief discussion of the facts, it seems a waste of time to remind counsel that questions of fact are for the determination of the jury. As to whether or not a contract was made, was for the determination of the .jury in the light of the evidence offered by. plaintiff and defendant. It is further within the province of the jury, under the evidence offered in the case, to determine whether or not there was was a breach of the contract as alleged and set forth in the petition of the defendant.
The rule, seems to be well settled that to constitute a valid contract there must be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Cincinnati Traction Co. v. KrogerOhio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sims v. Norfolk & Western Ry Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933