Legal Opinion

People v. Deyo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 150, Calendar No. 34,833Published

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

Defendant was convicted of possessing and transporting intoxicating liquor. He was properly convicted if the court was not in error in refusing to suppress the evidence furnished by the liquor seized at the time of his arrest.

The sheriff of Mecosta county had been informed that defendant was transporting liquor by automobile to his home in the village of Morley, and could be apprehended in the act Friday or Saturday nights. The officer believed the information reliable, and, late at night, with two of his deputies, waited in the highway, saw defendant’s car approach and its lights put out,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People v. KamhoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. People v. GossMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. KrahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API