Legal Opinion

Estate of Horowitz v. City of Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1982No. 81-1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this condemnation case, the property owners contend it was error for the trial court to disqualify their primary real estate appraiser’s expert testimony. We agree and reverse.

Florida’s constitutional guaranty1 of full and just compensation in eminent domain actions requires that courts take into account all facts and circumstances which bear a reasonable relationship to the loss occasioned an owner by virtue of his property being taken. Behm v. Division of Administration, Department of Transportation, 383 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1980); Jacksonville Expressway Authority v. Henry G. Dupree Co., 108…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Express. Auth. v. Henry G. Du Pree Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Buchman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Behm v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. TRUSTEES, ETC. v. Indico Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. School Board of Broward County v. SuretteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malone v. DIV. OF ADMIN., STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Bisque Assoc. v. Towers of QuaysideDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Dade Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Broks Center, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API