Legal Opinion

Ritchie v. Brindley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

Construing this will as'we must (Estate of Paddock, 186 Wis. 544, 549, 203 N. W. 347), from what appears within its four corners and in connection with the undisputed facts as to the relationships and surrounding circumstances, we are of the opinion that testator’s intention, always the polar star of construction, must have been that his widow was to receive a lesser estate than the fee which he then had and an estate which would terminate either upon her marrying again or upon her death.

He gives and bequeaths to his wife “full control” of all his property, houses, rents, etc., “as long as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Welsh v. GistCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  2. Bramell v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Jones v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Fuller v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. In Re the Estate of SchrieverNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haugan v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hebblewhite v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dobbin v. VandermeulenOregon Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API