Schimmel v. Schimmel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: “The court’s determination regarding custody * * * based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record (see, Paul G. v Donna G., 175 AD2d 236, 237; D’Errico v D’Errico, 158 AD2d 503, 504; Lenczycki v Lenczycki, 152 AD2d 621, 623)” (Matter of Samuel L. J. v Sherry H., 206 AD2d 886, lv denied 84 NY2d 810). The record supports Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Paul C. v. Tracy C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lenczycki v. LenczyckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Dingman v. PurdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Paul G. v. Donna G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stilson v. StilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Kahira C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Appell v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Jones v. HouckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Klestinec v. SmolinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.