Legal Opinion

In re Harvey

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1903No. 13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

In the city of Philadelphia .a municipal tax on real estate'becomes a prior lien upon the land from the time of assessment, and the lien continues, speaking generally, until a judicial sale produces a fund large enough to discharge the' •obligation in-full: Parker’s Appeal, 8 Watts & S. 449; Dungan’s Appeal, 88 Pa. 414; Smith v. Simpson, 60 Pa. 168. The remedy of the city is confined to the land against which the tax is assessed: Steen’s Estate, 175 Pa. 299, 34 Atl. 732. But, while in a sense this makes the city a secured creditor of the bankrupt, it does not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dungan's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  2. Parker's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  3. Estate of SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Prince & WalterDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Torrington Co. v. Sidway-Topliff Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API