Shantilal Bros. v. KMST Wholesale, Inc.
High Court of American Samoa
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Reconsideration:
Intervenor Nelson & Robertson Pty., Ltd. moves for reconsideration of our holding that plaintiff Shantilal Brothers, Ltd., is entitled to the proceeds of a judicial sale of certain property belonging to the defendant. This holding was based on our finding that intervenor’s chattel mortgage did not contain "a description of the specific article [or] *104articles . . . mortgaged" within the meaning of A.S.C.A. § 27.1510(c). Plaintiff, a judgment creditor without actual notice of the chattel mortgage, was therefore entitled to execute its judgment by seizing and selling…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. StockdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- United States v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1948
- Childress v. First State Bank of BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Nat'l. Bank of Panama v. Nat'l. Bank of ChipleySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.