Legal Opinion

William A. Trine v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, a Mutual Life Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1981No. 79-1634Published

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Disposition of this diversity action turns entirely on whether certain language in an insurance policy read either by itself or in the context of the entire policy is either patently or latently ambiguous. The facts are stipulated. The policy covers “hospital” expenses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coxen v. WESTERN EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Jeffries-Eaves, Inc., of Colo.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Urtado v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. Beck v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Halbert v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API