Legal Opinion

Ballerino v. Bigelow

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1891No. 14181PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new ' trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

— Ballerino brought this action against Mrs. Bigelow, claiming that she had forcibly deprived him of the possession of certain premises, and in pursuance of' such forcible entry unlawfully detains the same from him. . -

*501The damages claimed was the sum of two hundred dollars, and it is also alleged in the complaint that the rental value of the premises did not exceed twenty-five dollars per month.

The cause was originally brought in a justice’s court, and judgment being rendered for the plaintiff, an appeal was taken upon the law and facts to the superior court of the proper county.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newman v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Stacy v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Hoban v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API