Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarke Raymond Moore and John Bernard Spelz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1971No. 71-1212PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for manufacturing and possessing depressant or stimulant drugs, following a Jury trial and the denial of a motion for a new trial.

Clarke Moore, John Spelz, and Charles Reinking were indicted for conspiring to knowingly manufacture, compound, process and process for sale, depressant or stimulant drugs; to wit: diethyltryptamine, in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. § 331(q) (1) (Count 1) and unlawfully and knowingly engaging in the manufacture of diethyltryptamine, a depressant or stimulant drug, in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. §§ 331(q)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Isaac DrakeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Joseph E. Cafero A/K/A Ernie, in No. 72-1577 Appeal of Dominick Vinciguerra, A/K/A Dom, in No. 72-1578Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Louis I. Gordon, Eduardo Jose Garcia, Jeffrey Mark Berg, James M. Cowen, and Eric Theodore LubovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Matthew Otis CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Andrew J. WelebirCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API