Legal Opinion
K.E.A. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 5, 2001No. 3D00-2082PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Senior Judge.
K.E.A. challenges his adjudication of delinquency for the offense of disorderly conduct. He maintains that the evidence in *411this case was insufficient to support the adjudication. We agree.
When a witness testifies that he or she has no present recollection or memory of a fact, counsel may show the witness a writing or other object in an attempt to refresh the witness’ recollection. If, after seeing the document or object, the witness’ memory is jogged so that the witness has a present recollection of the fact, the witness may testify to the fact from his or her present…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Purifoy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Duval Utility Co. v. FLA. PUBLIC SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Darious Wilcox v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- KEA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- R.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.