Legal Opinion · Concurrence

A.D.B.H. v. Houston County Department of Human Resources

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 21, 2008No. 2060699Published

1ConcurrenceBryan, Judge

Pursuant to Roe v. Conn, 417 F.Supp. 769, 779 (M.D.Ala.1976), a state must establish that it has a compelling govern*65mental interest before terminating a parent’s parental rights. Under a strict-scrutiny analysis, the state is required to achieve this objective in a means that is least restrictive or drastic. As the Conn court stated: “The State’s interest, however, would become ‘compelling’ enough to sever entirely the parent-child relationship only when the child is subjected to real physical or emotional harm and less drastic measures would be unavailing.” Id. (emphasis added).

After Conn,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Roe v. ConnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1976
  3. Bowman v. STATE DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Miller v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Brown v. ALA. DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API