A.D.B.H. v. Houston County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceBryan, Judge
Pursuant to Roe v. Conn, 417 F.Supp. 769, 779 (M.D.Ala.1976), a state must establish that it has a compelling govern*65mental interest before terminating a parent’s parental rights. Under a strict-scrutiny analysis, the state is required to achieve this objective in a means that is least restrictive or drastic. As the Conn court stated: “The State’s interest, however, would become ‘compelling’ enough to sever entirely the parent-child relationship only when the child is subjected to real physical or emotional harm and less drastic measures would be unavailing.” Id. (emphasis added).
After Conn,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Roe v. ConnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1976
- Bowman v. STATE DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Miller v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Brown v. ALA. DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.