Merrick v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
This is an action by plaintiff assignees to enforce the provisions of a promissory note.
Issues
1. Whether plaintiffs, owners of a promissory note, are holders in due course.
2. Whether plaintiffs' claim is barred due to violations of security laws.
3. Did the trial court err when it denied defendants' jury demand?
4. Did the trial court err when it limited interest to 8 percent per annum?
5. Whether attorneys' fees allowed by the trial court are reasonable.
6. Whether plaintiff Walker was the sole owner of the promissory note involved herein.
Facts
Cochise College Park, Inc., was a real estate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Von Gohren v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Beeson v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Holohan v. MelvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Singleton v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Wilkinson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Olsen Media v. Energy SciencesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- First National Bank of Lakewood v. Union Tavern Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Canam Hambro Systems, Inc. v. HorbachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.