Legal Opinion

United States v. Catalan Roman

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided June 7, 2005No. CR 02-117PGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION FOLLOWING ORDER

PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.

Ruling from the bench on a government motion to compel capital defendants to disclose their penalty-phase experts, the Court held that such disclosure was essential to the government’s right of rebuttal under 18 U.S.C. § 3593(c) and pursuant to its inherent powers, ordered defendants to make immediate disclosure. (Docket No. 466, Tr. of 4/19/05 at 52) In granting the motion, the Court considered and discounted defendants’ arguments that they had eschewed reciprocal disclosure under Fed. R.Crim.P. Rule 16, and that in any event, Rule 16 is…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API