Fogarty v. Fogarty
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
The suit was brought to enjoin the defendant from diverting water flowing in a pipe to the land of the plaintiff, and to quiet plaintiff’s title to the same. The judgment was for the defendant, and the appeal is from an order denying a new trial.
The plaintiff is the owner of a piece of ground known as the Doyle place, which for many years has been supplied with water by means of an iron pipe conveying water thereto from a spring on a place known as the Thomas rancho, which is the. water in controversy; and one of the allegations of the complaint is “that the plaintiff and his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Morris v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1906
- Rose v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Peixouto v. PeixoutoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Kepfler v. KepflerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.