Legal Opinion

In re Crossman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of special term.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court, Brown, Justice.

The petitioner and the appellants, Joseph Hegeman and Asa Moore, are the executors and trustees, under the will of Austin D. Moore, form erly of the city of Brooklyn, deceased. The will and codicil was duly proved and admitted to probate by the surrogate of the county of Kings, and letters testamentary thereon, issued to all the executors. The property and effects of the estate, consisted of a large real estate in the city of Brooklyn, a. plantation with the stock and furniture thereon in the state of Florida, and stocks, bonds, mortgages and other dioses in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. DonnellyNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BullNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Walton v. WaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API