Knowlden v. Guardian Printing & Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error.
1Per curiam
This ivas an action ivhereby a married woman sought to recover damages resulting from three publications in the neAvspaper of plaintiff in error, charging her with adultery.
The trial judge instructed the jury that plaintiff was not entitled to recover punitive or vindictive damages, but was entitled to recover such damages as would compensate her for. injury done to her reputation and feelings, by the three publications made by the defendant, and conceded to be untrue.
A claim for punitive damages may be defended against by proof of lack of ill-will or.malice, and the damages sought *671may be…
2Cited by7 opinions
- O'Regan v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- Neafie v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Harris v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Van Poole v. Nippu Jiji Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1937
- Butler v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.