Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barringer v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 22, 1931No. 13182Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : The judgments in these two cases in my opinion should be reversed and the motions of the defendant for directed verdicts in its favor should have been granted for two reasons:(1) The bond in question was given to secure the faithful performance of a private contract between the contractor and the owner of the building; it was intended solely and exclusively for the protection of the owner; each of the plaintiffs is a third party, an utter stranger to the contract and bond, and has no right of action against the defendant surety upon the bond.(2) The specifications, contract,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Knight & Jillson Co. v. CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Electric Appliance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API