Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weaver v. Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 22, 1990No. Civ. 7567Published

1DissentRussell, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. This court has long held that a finding of loss of ability to earn is a prerequisite to an award of permanent partial disability benefits. Gibson v. Southern Stone Co., 500 So.2d 32 (Ala.Civ.App.1986); Littleton v. Gold Kist, Inc., 480 So.2d 1236 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). Here, however, a finding of loss of ability to earn was specifically made by the circuit court, and I do not find that the authority cited by the majority to require that the circuit court specify the percentage of that loss in its findings of fact.

Rather, those cases stand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Littleton v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Gibson v. Southern Stone Company Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Cook v. MunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API