Legal Opinion

Walter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1005 C.D. 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed a referee’s denial of benefits to William Walter under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1 Walter appeals. We affirm.

Walter, a maintenance man with General Steel, was discharged for excessive absenteeism and tardiness.

Walter asserts error in the Board’s decision because of the pendency of a labor grievance arbitration. This contention is clearly without merit. The outcome of a union grievance procedure has no effect on the determination of eligibility for unemployment compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Welsh v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API