Legal Opinion

Bell v. Warden FCI Dublin

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 19, 2021No. 5:17-cv-07346Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 ROBERTA RONIQUE BELL, Case No. 17-CV-07346-LHK 13 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 14 v.

28 U.S.C. § 2241

15 WARDEN FCI DUBLIN, Re: Dkt. No. 1 16 Respondent. 17 18 Before the Court is Petitioner Roberta Ronique Bell’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus 19 under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1 (“Petition”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the 20 relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES the instant Petition. 21 I. OVERVIEW 22…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Mose Stephens, Jr., A/K/A Steve M. Stephens v. Al Herrera, Warden United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Charles Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API