Legal Opinion
John W. Gottschalk Mfg. Co. v. Springfield Wire & Tinsel Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 1, 1937No. 3195PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BINGFIAM, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the Federal District Court for Massachusetts dismissing a petition for a supplemental injunction.
It appears that the petitioners, on December 14, 1932, brought a bill in equity charging the defendant, the Springfield Wire & Tinsel Company, with infringement of reissue letters patent No. 18,576 (reissued August 23, 1923, to Reginald F. Sedgley) for an improvement in the method of and apparatus for making coils; that in its answer the defendant questioned the validity and scope of the claims in issue by setting up certain prior art…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bartell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sutton v. WentworthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
- Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Transamerican Refining Corp. v. Dravo Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- William Baltz, an Individual, and Wonder Products Company, a Corporation v. The Fair, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc. (Now by Change of Name Dresser Sie, Inc.), and Dresser Industries, Inc., McCullough Tool Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.