Legal Opinion

Bignell v. Franks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 64PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Ottawa; Cross (Orien. S.), J. Bill by James Bignell against James A. Franks and another for the foreclosure of a land contract. From the decree rendered, all parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The bill of complaint prays foreclosure of a land contract executed by plaintiff to defendant Franks, dated April 10, 1907, for the sale of certain land in the city of Grand Haven for the sum of $2,800. Payments were to be made as follows;

“$100 per year for three years, and, if he puts up an additional hot house on the land costing not less than $250, it shall include the first year’s payment of $100, and after three years the payments shall be not less than $250 per year, with six per cent, interest to be paid semi-annually on $2,500 from this date, and on the $300 balance to be paid within…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nichols v. MumfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API