Legal Opinion
State ex rel. J. B. Harper & Son v. Judge of the Ninth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 15, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions
an application for a mandamus to the Judge of the Ninth Judicial Dis_ trict, Ean'ralson, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSpoeford, J.
The issue presented by the District Judge in his answer to the application for a mandamus, compels us to construe the Act, approved March 19th, 1857 (p. 270,) “to require the Judges of the Seventh' and Ninth Judicial Districts to interchange.”
It provides that after their election in April next, and after the first terms of their courts in their respective districts, the Judge of the Seventh District shall preside and hold the courts in the Ninth District, and the Judge of the Ninth District shall preside and hold the courts in the Seventh District, and so to continue alternating and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Escalle v. MarkNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Follmer v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- STRICKLEN v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- Charity Hospital v. MeyeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- New Orleans G. N. R. Co. v. Railroad Commission of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910