Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1981No. F-80-384Published

1DissentBrett, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent to this decision for the reason the instruction on Driving While Impaired was not given, in accordance with Jackson v. State, 554 P.2d 39 (Okl.Cr.1976). See also my dissent to Bailey v. State, 633 P.2d 1249 (Okl.Cr.), wherein a more complete statement is made concerning the offense of Driving While Impaired, as contrasted to Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981