Martin v. Castaneda

In an action, inter alia, to partition real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered July 2, 2009, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to confirm that portion of a referee’s report (Rosen, Ref.), dated February 13, 2009, as, after a hearing, recommended that the property be sold to effect partition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

After a hearing, in an unsigned report dated February 13, 2009, a referee made certain findings of…