Redwine v. State

Carley, Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of the offenses of rape and burglary. He appeals from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered on the jury’s verdicts.

Appellant enumerates only the general grounds, urging that the evidence, all of which was circumstantial, was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

A review of the record reveals the following: The victim could not positively identify appellant as her masked assailant. Appellant did, however, fit the victim’s general description of the man who had entered her home…