Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ocala Geriatric Center v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1996No. 96-947Published

1DissentBenton, Judge

The court today affirms a decision arrived at by application — in a factually flawed fashion — of a recently repudiated rule. In requiring payment of $19,700 as a penalty for failure to transmit a settlement check promptly, the judge of compensation claims reasoned:

The time limit for mailing payment in this case without incurring a penalty is seven days after the Order [approving joint petition for lump sum settlement] is mailed, pursuant to Bell v. University of Florida, 652 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Based on the testimony of Ms. Hamer, I find that the check was not mailed within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. University of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Clay Hyder Truck Lines v. AthertonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. PALM BEACH CTY. SCHOOL BD. v. Miller-NealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Sigg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API