Legal Opinion

Milhomme v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 20, 2017No. 3D16-2089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Following water damage to their home, Mr. and Mrs. Milhomme filed a claim under their homeowners’ insurance policy issued by Tower Hill Signature Insurance Company (“Tower Hill”). A Tower Hill claims service investigated the claim, did not dispute coverage for the date or type of loss, computed actual cash value and replacement value for the damage, and issued a cheek to Mr. and Mrs. Milhomme for the higher of the two values, less the deductible. Tower Hill’s transmittal letter stated that it would consider “supplemental claims for any damages discovered in the covered reconstruction and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Slayton v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vazquez v. Southern Fidelity Property & Casualty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. BRANDON GOLDBERG v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. Dorra v. Rockhill Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API