Legal Opinion

Branton v. Martin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 29, 1963No. 18104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

This action involves title to a lot and improvements in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, which formerly belonged to Sarah A. Branton. The respondents Sam. A. Branton, Essie B. Martain, Lela B. Owens and Alice B. Thomas claim title in themselves and in the appellant Maggie Branton as tenants in common under a deed from Sarah A. Branton dated January 8, 1946, and recorded January 20, 1958. The appellant Maggie Branton claims title in herself under a deed from Sarah A. Branton dated August 31, 1946, and recorded April 23, 1951. The appellant Laura Branton supports the claim of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Larisey v. LariseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  2. Watson v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  3. Merck v. MerckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. Frederick v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Smith v. HuntSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. May v. JeterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Geddings v. GeddingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API