Legal Opinion

Clark v. Boyreau

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth District. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

This is an action to recover the possession of certain premises, situated within the city and county of San Francisco, and arises upon the following facts: In 1853, the plaintiff conveyed the premises to Baker, for the consideration of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars, and received from him, at the time, a mortgage as security for the purchase money. The conveyance and mortgage were executed simultaneously. Both were of the premises in fee, but without covenants of warranty. Upon the foreclosure of the mortgage, the plaintiff became the purchaser, and received the Sheriff’s deed.

To…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. SissonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Bull v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. PRIDE Industries v. VersAbility Resources, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API