Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 4, 1986No. 10-84-05413; CA A34258Published

1DissentRossman, J.

I believe that the affidavit, if read in a common sense, nontechnical manner, adequately establishes the informants’ basis of knowledge under Spinelli v. United States, 393 US 410, 89 S Ct 584, 21 L Ed 2d 637 (1969), and Aquilar v. Texas, 378 US 108, 84 S Ct 1509, 12 L Ed 2d 723 (1964). Thus, I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly suppressed the evidence. Accordingly, I dissent.

This case turns on what is, or is not, stated within the four corners of the affidavit. In our evaluation of that document, we should be mindful of two well-accepted and significant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API