Legal Opinion
Rahal v. Liquor Control Comm.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1965No. 7750PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuffey, J.
This is an appeal from the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County in a proceeding based on Section 119.12, Revised Code. Appellant, a liquor permit holder, was charged with two violations of Regulation 52 of the Ohio Board of Liquor Control involving the use of indecent language on the premises. Upon a finding of guilty, her license was ordered suspended for 35 days. The order was affirmed by the Common Pleas Court.
Regulation 52, as pertinent here, provides:
“No permit holder shall knowingly or willfully allow in, upon or about his licensed premises improper conduct or (of) any kind, type or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wittenberg v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Burger v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Wallace v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Smith v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kosick v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Derakhshan v. State Medical Bd., 07ap-261 (10-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- American Legion Post 0046 Bellevue v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hoge v. Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969
- VFW Post 1238 Bellevue v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.